This presentation works best in landscape mode.
Mid-term platform work, framed as four durable promises to the merchant.
Promotions V1, Cart API, Facturante AR and QR interoperable are landing in Q2. What comes next?
This deck frames the mid-term as a platform program, not a feature list.
These consolidate the 6 themes + 5 foundations of Vision 2026 into merchant-facing language.
6 initiatives
8 initiatives
8 initiatives
5 initiatives
No local competitor combines native e-commerce with POS. Shopify Pro has the global play but no LatAm payments or fiscal.
| Capability | LatAm local | Shopify Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Single sale, multi-fulfillment | None | $89/loc |
| BOPIS + cross-channel exchange | None | Yes |
| Omnichannel customer recognition | None | Yes |
| Native e-commerce + POS in one stack | None | No (LatAm) |
Outcome: category leadership in LatAm omnichannel.
The most strategically important T → D trajectory of 2026.
BR-first with Stone. AR + MX as intent, no provider yet.
Closes the last gap of "one stack, no middleware" in market #2.
No LatAm competitor has it. Depends on mobile app.
Store credit + crediário + cuenta corriente, cross-channel.
Pricing flat, no per-location fee. Every MSO feature we ship is worth more here than to Shopify merchants.
5 of 6 competitors have this. Closes the "PDV is for selling, not operating" gap.
Native dashboard + commission calculation. 4 of 6 competitors have it.
Plus: price lists by channel/branch, advanced cash management, channel + branch reporting, permissions and roles, AI-driven report interpretation.
Native app + offline mode + extensibility = answer to two known competitive gaps and a foundation for new commercial cases.
App Store ratings. Offline blocker reported in BR interior (GTM).
The heaviest platform investment of the roadmap. Continuous architecture work spanning multiple horizons.
Extensibility for third-party apps and partner integrations.
Premium retail with white-label look and feel.
Initiatives stay in their horizon until they ship. Some span multiple quarters and stay in the same horizon until close.
The strategy is durable. Execution depends on cross-team negotiation.
Discovery in progress. Build sequence depends on their delivery of the core emission capability.
"Apollo > Dux > PDV" per Q2 memo. Discovery active with Nuvempago BR. Capacity is negotiated, not assumed.
BOPIS, multi-fulfillment, customer recognition cross these domains. Coordination is the gating factor.
Saying no to these is what makes the rest defensible.
We can revisit any of these, but the current shape is what makes the four theses realistic.
Three asks. Then we run.
Not on the dates. Theses are durable; Qs will shift.
Especially with Invoicing (NFC-e) and Pago Nube (terminal). When we hit a priority conflict, we'll come back here.
If we said no to something you think should be a yes, this is the moment.
Where do you want to push first?